LeadToSheet vs Fillout
Fillout positions itself as a Typeform replacement with stronger logic and tighter CRM hooks. Sheets sync still requires their integration layer.
Feature-by-feature comparison
How LeadToSheet and Fillout compare on the features that matter.
Last verified: May 5, 2026
| Feature | LeadToSheet | Fillout |
|---|---|---|
| Works with existing forms | ||
| Zero-modification SDK option | ||
| No-JS form endpoint option | ||
| Native Google Sheets sync | ||
| UTM parameter capture | ||
| Paid Ads Attribution | ||
| Multi-form auto-detection | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Email notifications | ||
| Multi-site support | ||
| No per-submission fees |
Why teams switch to LeadToSheet
Direct Sheets sync - no integration runtime in between
Tiny Preact embed runtime (~25 KB gzip) fitting the host page styles
Schema versioning so historic submissions still resolve to the schema that produced them
Who should choose Fillout?
- Strong conditional logic and multi-step UX
- Multiple submit destinations including HubSpot, Notion, Airtable
- Customizable theming
Who should choose LeadToSheet?
- Teams that want form capture without modifying existing forms
- Marketers who need UTM and click ID attribution in Google Sheets
- Agencies managing forms across multiple client sites
- Anyone who wants a 60-second setup with native Google Sheets sync
Pricing comparison
Fillout's Starter is $19/mo (1,000 responses) and Pro $49/mo (5,000). LeadToSheet's hosted forms start at $9/mo with native Sheets sync and no integration runtime to monitor.
Pricing verified as of May 5, 2026
Switch from Fillout in 3 steps
Migrating takes minutes, not hours.
Rebuild the form in LeadToSheet, or paste your Fillout schema description into the AI generator
Swap the embed snippet - submissions land in your Sheet immediately
Disable the Fillout integration to your Sheet to avoid duplicate rows
Ready to switch from Fillout?
Install one script, connect Google Sheets, and start capturing every form submission in under 60 seconds.